Earliest, brand new highest proportion out-of people of sexual minorities, more 30% of your last shot
This is regarded as deficiencies in representativeness in our decide to try. I consider one to a choice interpretation is possible. This research shares with past studies an equivalent testing means and you can society (Spanish university students with the exact same age range and you will regarding the same college). We’ll inform you enough time of information range plus the proportion out of sexual minority participants: , 14.7% , , 8.6% . A very clear trend is. Brand new proportion from sexual minority professionals are gradually broadening within our examples. We could envision a couple of choices to establish that it. Very first, all of our surveys are not just biased by the sexual orientation (highest probability of contribution for low-heterosexual some body), and in addition one to prejudice keeps growing. We simply cannot look for people officially possible reason for it possible transform of prejudice around the big date. Next, indeed on the inhabitants from college students (The country of spain, one university) the current presence of low-heterosexuality are expanding. Which next solution manage imply that the difficulty out-of representativeness try far more apparent one real. Next research is necessary to describe this time. Whatever the case, inside our regression analyses we included sexual positioning due to the fact covariate. Likewise, to assists the brand new analyses, we decided to group users on the heterosexuals and you may low-heterosexuals, thus losing this new nuances associated with the fresh new decisions away from people in sexual minorities.
Response: Towards 1st element of that it feedback (“Addititionally there is need to believe you to definitely heterosexuals and sexual minorities differ with regard to their various short-term and you will a lot of time-identity mating actions”) i fully concur. This is the reason why those individuals details were already found in the fresh several regression analyses.
We including agree with the proven fact that sexual direction and you may gender will get work together. In the next tables we reveal the outcomes of your own linear regression studies whenever this type of interactions are included in the fresh habits.
Additionally there is reasoning to think you to heterosexuals and sexual minorities disagree regarding its some temporary and a lot of time-term mating steps, maybe moderated because of the gender (sex x sexual direction interaction)
- PLoS One to. 2021; 16(2): e0246350. »
- Choice Letter 1
Many thanks for submitting your manuscript so you can PLOS One. Shortly after careful consideration, we believe which possess merit but cannot totally see PLOS A person’s guide standards because already stands. Hence, we ask you to fill in a modified style of the fresh manuscript you to address new items elevated in the review processes. I found myself not able to hold the same reviewers nevertheless 3rd customer thought absolutely to your report. She think you probably did a good occupations dealing with comments but asks for a few so much more change.
Delight fill in their modified manuscript from the . If you will you desire more hours than that it accomplish their revisions, please reply to that it content otherwise contact this new diary work environment on When you’re ready to submit your own change, log on to and choose the newest ‘Submissions Wanting Revision’ folder so you’re able to locate your own manuscript document.
If you need making change with the economic revelation, please become your own up-to-date report on your own resume cover letter. Assistance to own resubmitting your profile records arrive underneath the customer comments after so it letter.
When the relevant, we recommend that you deposit their lab standards directly into increase the new reproducibility of the performance. assigns the process its very own identifier (DOI) so it are going to be quoted individually in the future. To possess tips get a hold of:
step 1. In case your article authors have effectively treated your comments raised during the a good prior bullet away from feedback and you also think that which manuscript try now appropriate for guide, it is possible to mean that right here so you’re able to avoid the new “Comments on the Creator” point, get into their conflict of interest report on “Confidential in order to Editor” area, and fill in the “Accept” testimonial.